Enterprises are badly burned by security tools that don’t work. When they finally see a solution that does what it purports to do, the shock is palpable.
How can you secure an organization by using identity, behavior and risk? Preempt CEO Ajit Sancheti recently conducted an interview with Blog Talk Radio on how the enterprise perimeter is eroding - and what to do about it. Identity and Access Threat Prevention is a critical component of an effective enterprise cybersecurity, and as Ajit explains, a strategy that combines holistic visibility and real-time enforcement addresses the complex nature of today’s enterprise IT environments.
Topics: Insider Threat
Penetration testing is a critical best practice for virtually any organization’s cybersecurity posture. By putting defenses to the test against trained offensively-minded professionals, organizations can gain deep insights into how they’ll fare against real attackers. Often, the challenge is that the results are not what you would have hoped. When pen testers are able to carve through your defenses at will, it can be discouraging and hard to know where to start.
Cyber security is a complex animal that requires many disciplines and a diverse toolkit. Typically, resources are limited, and incident response and security staff are overloaded with noise, irrelevant alerts and incomplete static information. With so many diverse systems its difficult to utilize them in a coordinated and timely way.
Human nature motivates us to enhance productivity, make things easy, find workarounds and to crave information that is being kept from us. How do these motivations change the way people work? Do their actions put their company at risk? Do IT Security teams need to understand basic psychology to protect their organizations?
While a 2017 Harvey Nash/KPMG survey of nearly 4,500 CIOs and tech leaders globally found that cyber security vulnerability is at an all-time high, the biggest jump in threats came from insider attacks which increased from 40 percent to 47 percent over the last year. And that’s a modest estimate; reports from an IBM Security survey suggested that 60 percent of all attacks were carried out by insiders. Of these attacks, three-quarters involved malicious intent, and one-quarter involved inadvertent actors.
Earlier this week, I published an article with ITSP Magazine that discusses a newly brewing concept within Enterprises around penalizing employees for bad security behavior. Can you imagine if your company penalized you for clicking on a phishing link? Or because you bent the security rules in order to get something done more easily?
I believe there is a “denial syndrome” that exists in cyber security. I’m not referring to the “It won’t happen to me” concept, I’m pointing to a deeper and more dangerous belief. In psychology, denial happens when we are uncomfortable with the facts of reality and instead of dealing with it we reject it, insisting it is not correct.
Last week, I had the opportunity to spend a day at a Legal Services Information Sharing & Analysis Organization(LS-ISAO) workshop in New York City, hosted by a leading law firm. Close to 100 security professionals from law firms around the country participated. While most law firms have small dedicated security teams, what was apparent from the beginning was that the challenges ahead of them were not small.