In the hustle and bustle of our modern world, we can all get easily lost in the noise. One kind of noise is most frustrating for security teams: the noise of security incidents. With more and more data feeds into your security analytics products, it seems like we are creating more problems for ourselves with the all of the alerts and not enough manpower.
Enterprises are badly burned by security tools that don’t work. When they finally see a solution that does what it purports to do, the shock is palpable.
According to haveIbeenpwned.com, close to 8 billion accounts have been compromised. The site provides a tool to see if any of your passwords have been compromised and are available on the dark-net. Once passwords are compromised, they are easily exposed to bad actors who can use them for brute force attacks and credential stuffing.
Over the past few years, we’ve observed significant changes in the types of conversations we’re having with CISOs. What used to be discussions about how to keep bad guys out has evolved to how to manage and address internal threats. Internal threats come in a variety of shapes and sizes. It could be an attacker who has already gotten in and waiting for the right moment to make a move. It could also be an insider threat. It could be a malicious insider looking to do harm to the organization. Or it could be employees who don’t mean any harm but may doing things (knowingly or unknowingly) that could put an organization at risk.
With the perimeter all but dissolved, and as enterprises transition to the cloud, it’s becoming clear that identity, and where there are points of access, is the new perimeter. The challenge for many organizations is how to understand their posture around identity. This requires understanding who is doing what, when, and where, and understanding it across all applications and platforms on prem, in the cloud and in hybrid environments. Having a holistic view of identity--all users, privileges, access patterns and accounts--is becoming more critical in order to be more proactive and to have proper controls over accounts (privileged, user, service, and more) and to being able to protect accounts from compromise.
At the recent Gartner Security & Risk Management Summit, analysts presented their findings on the top technologies for information security and their implications for security organizations in 2018. At the event Neil MacDonald highlighted Top 10 Security Projects for Security and Risk Management Organizations. He continues by emphasizing that these are projects with real supporting technologies that CISOs should be exploring.
Service Accounts can represent tremendous security risk for enterprises. And many of our customers struggle with how to best identify, control and protect these accounts. Let’s take a closer look at what service accounts are and what organizations can do to protect service accounts from attackers and insiders.
NotPetya, a recent malware, masquerading as the known Petya ransomware started wreaking havoc at a world scale last week. Initially, it looked like another wave in the malware storm that started with Shadow Brokers’ publication of EternalBlue and other zero-day vulnerabilities in Windows OS. And, in fact, NotPetya used EternalBlue as one of the lateral movement methods in its arsenal. But, apparently, the developers of NotPetya wanted to hit some high-value targets and the risk that these networks had already been fully patched would have ruined their attack.
While a 2017 Harvey Nash/KPMG survey of nearly 4,500 CIOs and tech leaders globally found that cyber security vulnerability is at an all-time high, the biggest jump in threats came from insider attacks which increased from 40 percent to 47 percent over the last year. And that’s a modest estimate; reports from an IBM Security survey suggested that 60 percent of all attacks were carried out by insiders. Of these attacks, three-quarters involved malicious intent, and one-quarter involved inadvertent actors.
Earlier this week, I published an article with ITSP Magazine that discusses a newly brewing concept within Enterprises around penalizing employees for bad security behavior. Can you imagine if your company penalized you for clicking on a phishing link? Or because you bent the security rules in order to get something done more easily?
True Positives. It’s a topic of great interest to me. Security Operations can spend a lot of time dealing with separating out the truly non-malicious events. There is an easier way. But, before we go further, let’s align and calibrate on the terminology of True/False Positives/Negatives. Some of these terms have varying levels of agreement. It reminds me of VLAN-- you can have 5 people in the room and there will be 6 different definitions for it. To make sure we are on the same page, let's start with basic definitions accompanied with real life examples.